
Encapsulator CS-111.
The Specification Sheet.
The capture nose on the Goose round. The Goose round with a capture bay in the nose: the same tube and magazine, a mechanical release, and a target brought down intact.

The capture nose on the Goose round. The Goose round with a capture bay in the nose: the same tube and magazine, a mechanical release, and a target brought down intact.
Encapsulator CS-111 changes the nose and nothing behind it. The figures below size the launch load and the capture event; the cards say why a buyer who needs what was overhead recovered whole would load it.
The capture round matches the kinetic round's mass, bore, exit velocity and magazine pitch, so it rides the same tube and indexes in the same magazine.
The designed effect is rotor fouling, and the designed outcome is an aircraft brought down intact and recoverable, so what was overhead can be examined, traced and attributed.
Every capture path the design carries is non-energetic, and where an airbag-style gas generant would deploy faster, the design declines it. There is no pyrotechnic anywhere in the round or in the launch chain that throws it.
The launcher lays the shot from a cue, a person arms it, and a partner's cue is a permissive that can never bypass the interlock chain.
The specification of Encapsulator CS-111: the round it shares with Goose, the capture bay, the launch load, the release, the capture event, the effect, guidance, environment and handling.
The round it shares with GooseThe capture bayThe launch load on the payloadThe releaseThe capture eventThe effectGuidance and engagementEnvironment and handling
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| All-up mass | 1.6 kg | design value; unchanged from CS-110, so the magazine, indexing pitch and launch energy are shared |
| Bore | Ø90 mm, 63.6 cm² | design value, shared with CS-110 |
| Exit velocity | ~189 m/s | design value, the shared launch case |
| Launch | 30 bar over ~3 m | design launch case, shop-air class, shared with CS-110 |
| Launch energy delivered | 28.6 kJ | calculated, the shared launch case |
| Airframe aft of the nose bulkhead | Goose CS-110, unchanged | the design boundary: all new hardware is forward of the bulkhead |
| External envelope, mass and indexing features | Identical to CS-110 | design requirement for a mixed kinetic and capture magazine |
| Magazine | Interchangeable with the kinetic round | the two index together in one magazine |
| Propulsion aboard | None | a pneumatically launched, ballistic carrier |
| Pyrotechnics in the launch chain | None | stored-air launch |
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Nose bulkhead | Carries the payload's inertial load into the hull sidewall | design function; keeps that load off the dispersal head |
| Bay elements | Stored energy source, capture medium, dispersal head, mechanical release | the common bay architecture |
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Average launch acceleration | ~5,953 m/s², ~607 g | calculated, 189²/(2 × 3.0), averaged over the stroke |
| Peak launch shock | 1,159 g | calculated at the start of the stroke; every head must survive it |
| Self-pressure of a 180 mm liquid column | ~11.8 bar | calculated at about 1.1 g/cm³ and the average acceleration |
| Pressure-threshold release | Excluded | the payload reaches release pressure during the launch stroke |
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Positive mechanical action | never pressure-triggered |
| Mechanism the capture noses share | Collapse trigger | the nose collapses mechanically on contact and the collapse itself releases the net or canopy |
| Name of the mechanism | Standoff release, or deployment trigger | it opens a bay and initiates nothing |
| Power aboard | None | no battery and no proximity sensor |
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Closing speed, design case | ~200 m/s | calculated: head-on against a 3 kg multirotor at ~15 m/s gives ~204 m/s |
| Deployment window at 1 m standoff | 5.0 ms | calculated at ~200 m/s closing |
| Window at 5 m and at 20 m | 25 ms and 100 ms | calculated at ~200 m/s closing |
| Free-expanding chemistry at 1 m | ~1,000 to 3,000 times too slow | calculated against commercial two-part cream times of 5–15 s |
| Fill rate for a 12 L envelope in 5 ms | ~2,400 L/s | calculated; the rate class of an automotive airbag inflator |
| Capture paths | Non-energetic only | free-expanding chemistry is ruled out as the primary medium by the timing arithmetic; no gas generant and no pyrotechnic initiator |
| Post-contact agent | Contact-transfer adhesive, optional | a persistence layer after contact, never the expanding medium |
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Designed effect | Rotor fouling | one or two rotors fouled and the disc unbalanced |
| Outcome | Target brought down intact and recoverable | design requirement; capture only, with no destructive effect designed |
| Energetic material | None | no warhead, fuze, gas generant or pyrotechnic initiator |
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Guidance tier | Tier 2, fibre, recommended primary | design recommendation; a preset round flies the arc it was given and cannot see a moving target |
| Tier 2 line | Optical fibre paid out of the tube | a wire, not a link; nothing on it radiates |
| Laying | Solved at the launcher before the shot | as for the kinetic round |
| Arming | A human arm action for every shot | a partner cue is a permissive only |
| Parameter | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental design case | −30 °C | design value, the winter case |
| Exclusion zone | The full muzzle arc and downrange | kept clear while the launcher is armed and firing; the area-clear key must be made before the launcher will arm |
| Stored-gas path | A high-pressure gas bottle in each round | the path the design arithmetic favours; a pressure vessel in the magazine, in the tube and downrange |
| Magazine | No pyrotechnics | no cook-off or hazardous-storage constraint from the launch chain |
| After the engagement | A fouled airframe still falls | a secondary hazard the design carries |
Encapsulator CS-111 is a nose variant on the Goose line, not a new airframe. Everything from the tail fins forward to the nose bulkhead is Goose CS-110, unchanged; everything forward of it is new.
That boundary is the whole architectural idea. The launcher, the magazine, the ballistics and the guidance were paid for by the kinetic round, and the capture round inherits them rather than repeating them. What is new is the nose bulkhead and the bay in front of it: a stored energy source, the capture medium, a dispersal head and a mechanical release.
Four figures are held identical to CS-110 on purpose: the 1.6 kg all-up mass, the Ø90 mm bore, the ~189 m/s exit and the magazine pitch. With those held, the capture round matches the kinetic round's external envelope, mass and indexing features, and the two index side by side in one magazine. The choice of effect moves from procurement to the breech.
Everything new on the round sits forward of the nose bulkhead, in a bay built around four elements that stay the same whatever capture medium is packed into it.
The nose bulkhead carries the payload's inertial load into the hull sidewall rather than into the dispersal head, so the launch cannot press the payload into its own release.
Compressed gas, or a compressed spring stack, held until the release lets it go.
Packed or contained in the bay. The timing arithmetic rules free-expanding chemistry out as the primary medium.
The head decides whether the capture medium opens into a useful curtain or a useless knot.
A positive mechanical action that holds the bay shut through the launch stroke and needs no electrical power aboard to open.
Whatever is packed into the bay is accelerated by the same stroke as the round: about 607 g averaged over the stroke, and 1,159 g at the peak, which every head must survive.
| Quantity | Figure | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Average launch acceleration | ~5,953 m/s², ~607 g | 189²/(2 × 3.0), over the stroke |
| Peak launch shock | 1,159 g | At the start of the stroke, all heads |
| Self-pressure at the base of a 180 mm liquid column | ~11.8 bar | ρ·a·h at about 1.1 g/cm³ |
A threshold release would have to be rated above the pressure the payload reaches during the stroke, then driven past it milliseconds later inside a round with no electrical power. The release is a positive mechanical action instead, such as a latch or a collapsing nose.
Canadian Shield does not build fuzes. The mechanism at the front of CS-111 is a standoff release, or deployment trigger: it opens a bay, and there is nothing aboard for it to initiate.
An unpowered round carries no battery, so an active proximity sensor is not available without putting back the electronics the design removed. That leaves releases that are mechanical from end to end. The collapse trigger is the mechanism the capture noses share: the nose collapses mechanically on contact, and the collapse itself releases the net or canopy, with no initiator and no electrical path.
The payload has to be deployed before the round arrives, and the time available is set by the standoff and the closing speed. Head-on against a 3 kg multirotor, the design case is about 200 m/s.
| Release standoff | Time to the target |
|---|---|
| At contact | 0 ms |
| 1 m | 5.0 ms |
| 5 m | 25 ms |
| 20 m | 100 ms |
Commercial two-part expanding chemistries work on cream times of 5 to 15 s, between one thousand and three thousand times too slow at a metre, and there is no standoff at which such a foam both expands in time and is still where the target will be. Filling a 12 L envelope in 5 ms takes about 2,400 L/s, the rate class of an automotive airbag. Airbags reach it with a pyrotechnic gas generant, which the carriers-not-munitions line rules out; the design arithmetic finds that stored cold gas can reach it without one.
The capture nose does not wrap a whole airframe. It fouls one or two rotors and unbalances the disc, and that is still a capture.
Wrapping even a small multirotor whole takes far more mass than the bay can carry, so the effect the round is designed for is rotor fouling: the capture medium goes into the disc, the disc loses its balance and the aircraft comes down. On a small multirotor one or two fouled rotors are enough. The capture medium has to be in the disc rather than near it.
The mission ends with the target intact and recoverable. The airframe, and whatever it was carrying, can be examined, traced and attributed. A fouled airframe still falls, a round that misses still comes down on its arc, and human safety comes first on the ground beneath both.
No warhead, fuze, primer, propellant, gas generant or initiator, in the round or in the magazine.
The aircraft comes down whole, so what was overhead can be traced and attributed.
Collision where collision is the right answer; capture where the airframe should come down in one piece.

The environmental design case is −30 °C. A steel nose does not notice the cold; stored energy, a packed capture medium and a release that has to move inside milliseconds do.
Gas output, seal compliance and the stiffness of a packed textile all move with temperature, and so would the cure of any post-contact adhesive. Each is carried at the design case rather than at room temperature, because a capability that only works above freezing is not a product for this ground.
The kinetic round needs nothing after the muzzle. For the capture round the recommended primary tier is Tier 2: a fibre paid out of the tube, with a person in the loop.
A preset round flies the arc it was given and cannot see a moving target, and the systems engineering recommends the fibre tier for the capture round for that reason.
Holding mass, bore, exit velocity and magazine pitch identical lets a magazine index both rounds, and leaves the choice of effect to each shot.
| Goose CS-110 | Encapsulator CS-111 | |
|---|---|---|
| All-up mass | 1.6 kg | 1.6 kg, held identical |
| Bore | Ø90 mm on 63.6 cm² | Ø90 mm on 63.6 cm² |
| Exit velocity | ~189 m/s | ~189 m/s |
| Magazine pitch | One pitch | The same pitch |
| The nose | A solid steel slug | A stored energy source, a capture medium, a dispersal head and a mechanical release |
| At the target | Collision | Rotor fouling, the airframe down intact |
| Guidance tier | Tier 1, preset | Tier 2, fibre, recommended primary |
| Energetic material | None | None |
The lines that hold for the capture round on every launch platform and for every customer.
The page this sheet specifies, and the sheets beside it in the line.
The page this sheet specifies, with the pictures and the reasoning.
Pneumatic launch on shop air for the Ø90 bore.
A first conversation needs the ground beneath the engagement, what crosses it, the sensing already in place and what has to be recovered intact afterwards. Every enquiry is screened.
Not an offer. Enquiries are screened, international transfer is subject to Canadian export permits taken per shipment, and all designs, systems and technologies shown are patent pending.