TREAT THE WEED —
NOT THE WHOLE FIELD.
Machine vision finds the target; only that nozzle opens. Built to cut total product volume per acre.
Capture · Infer · Decide · Valve · Dose
The targeted-application sibling of the broadcast Sprayer: the same airframe, tank and pump, with one new subsystem — a forward-looking camera and onboard inference model that finds the target plant, feeding a boom where every nozzle carries its own valve. Only the nozzle passing over a detection opens. A work machine, not a broadcaster.
Machine vision finds the target; only that nozzle opens. Built to cut total product volume per acre.
Capture · Infer · Decide · Valve · Dose
The Spot Sprayer is Canadian Shield’s targeted-application field machine: the same uncrewed airframe, tank, pump and boom lineage as the broadcast Sprayer CS-560, with one new subsystem added — a forward-mounted camera and onboard inference model that identifies target plants against crop or bare ground, paired with a boom where every nozzle carries its own solenoid valve. Only the nozzles passing directly over a detection open. Everything else on the boom stays shut.
It sits beside the Sprayer in the Industrial line’s application family, and the split between them is deliberate. The Sprayer earns its keep on uniform, full-field coverage; the Spot Sprayer earns its keep wherever the target is a fraction of the field, not the whole of it — patchy weed pressure, spot infestations, fence-lines, and any job where dosing clean crop or bare ground is pure waste. The agronomic purpose is stated plainly: reduce total product volume per acre, and with it cost, drift and runoff, without giving up the pass.
The two machines share a shop floor and a parts bin on purpose. Of the ten major subsystems on the platform, four are genuinely new — onboard inference compute, the individually-valved manifold, the detection model, and the perception-to-valve chain that ties them together. The other six — airframe, power bus, flight control, tank, pump, safety chain — are the Sprayer’s, inherited outright. That ratio is the honest description of the platform: an inherited applicator, taught to look before it doses.
The two errors this machine can make are not symmetric, and the design treats them that way: a conservative decision threshold and a default-decline behavior on any ambiguous detection, because the broadcast follow-up is always still available — a wrongly treated crop plant is damage that doesn’t undo.
A camera and an onboard inference model sit forward of the boom, reading the row ahead. When the model calls a target, that detection is handed to a scheduler that knows exactly which nozzle will pass over that ground point — and opens only that valve, timed to the boom’s arrival, not the camera’s.
The chain has five links, and every one of them costs time: capture the image, run the inference pass, decide and map the detection to a nozzle, open the solenoid, and let the fluid travel from valve to target. The sum of those five delays, multiplied by ground speed, is exactly how far ahead of the boom the sensor has to see — so the forward offset between camera and nozzle isn’t a styling choice, it’s the one dimension the chain’s own arithmetic sets. Faster ground speed and tighter placement trade directly against each other; the machine cannot be made quicker without either shortening the chain or accepting a larger error.
The two failure directions aren’t priced the same. A target the model misses simply survives to the next pass — cheap. A crop plant the model wrongly treats is damaged — not cheap. So the decision logic runs conservative on purpose: when a detection is ambiguous, the default is not to treat, and the machine leaves that ground for the next look rather than guessing.
The complete data card for the Spot Sprayer — configuration, perception, the application system, its governing relationships, flight control and compliance, grouped the way a fleet buyer compares them. Where the platform is governed by a relationship rather than a single number, the relationship is published.
No headline placement-accuracy or product-reduction percentage is published: on this machine both are governed by the field variables stated above — infestation fraction, ground speed, swath and threshold — and a figure quoted without them attached would be meaningless. The governing relationships are published instead.
Canadian Shield’s house thesis is that manufacturing is the decisive capability, and precision agriculture is where that manufacturing base earns its keep on Canadian ground — literally.
The Spot Sprayer advances the civil-line thesis on two fronts at once. First, input reduction: the entire subsystem exists to put less product on the field for the same result, which is the sharpest possible argument a civil work machine can make to the operator paying for the chemical. Second, sovereign manufacturing: the airframe, tank, pump and flight-control stack are the same production lineage as the Sprayer CS-560 and the rest of the Industrial line, built on the group’s owned Canadian shop floor rather than assembled from an imported broadcast platform with a camera taped on.
And the radio boundary runs the way it does across the whole civil line. The no-radio doctrine governs the defence, underground and tethered platforms without exception — but the Industrial line is the surface civil exception, and the Spot Sprayer uses both radio and GNSS openly: conventional RF for command and telemetry, GNSS for row-accurate navigation and for the per-nozzle actuation log that is the platform’s other product. A quarter-section is not a jammed battlefield, and we do not build for one out here.
Beside the Spot Sprayer on the Industrial roster sits its broadcast sibling — same tank, same pump, same airframe, running the uniform-coverage job the Spot Sprayer doesn’t try to do. Both draw on the CS-700 dock for turnaround and the same fleet-wide safety chain. One shop floor, two ways of putting product on a field.
A Spot Sprayer job is a loop, not a flight: the operator’s field plan compiles, the machine executes it row by row, and what comes home is a record of exactly what was dosed and where. Illustrative of how the machine is used — not a job record.
The crew arrives with the machine, a tote of product, and the dock. The field boundary, the crop rows, buffer zones and any known infestation areas compile into a field plan before the first pass. Product, concentration and mixing instruction come from the operator and the registered label — never from the machine.
The machine flies the row at the working height and speed the latency budget allows, camera reading ahead, valves opening only on detections. The operator flies the plan and owns the exceptions; the machine doses only what the chain confirms — and each actuation is logged with position, timestamp and the frame that triggered it. Evidence, not just spray.
Back at the dock the tank purges between products and the pack turns around for the next leg. The machine leaves ready for the next tote and the next field; what remains is the field’s own record — a per-nozzle actuation log with detection imagery, the operator’s evidence of what was, and wasn’t, treated.
The Spot Sprayer shares its airframe, tank and pump with its broadcast sibling, and both turn around on the same dock standard. Same lineage, different jobs — the broadcast pass and the targeted one.
Uniform, full-field coverage on the same airframe, tank and pump — the job the Spot Sprayer doesn’t try to do.
Download PDF ↓Machine vision finds the target and only that nozzle opens — built for the field where the problem is a fraction of the acreage.
Download PDF ↓The dock standard shared across the Industrial-line application family — refill, rinse and turnaround between legs.
Download PDF ↓If patchy weed pressure, fence-lines or spot infestations are costing you full-field product on a partial-field problem, the conversation starts with your acreage — and with the machine built to look before it doses.